Published
March 10, 1983. Residents of Utah seem to take it
on the chin in certain statistical reports. A few days ago, a professor at BYU
sent me a note in the campus mail with a Xerox copy of an article. Among other
things, the article claimed that Utah has a higher than average divorce rate,
suicide rate, illegitimate birth rate, and child abuse rate. He wrote at the
bottom. “Is this all true?”
Are we really that bad in this
state? Are the statistics and implication accurate? Are we “above average” in
all these categories? I think not.
Look, for instance, at the divorce
statistics. One report recently indicated that “Divorces (in Utah) continue to
escalate, surpassing the national rate. In 1982, Utahan couples parted at a
rate of 5.4 per thousand population for a total of 8.350, an increase of 3.4
percent over the previous year.” The same report also noted that “Nationally,
the divorce rate declines by 1.98 to 5.2 per thousand population. The Utah rate
is now 3.8% above the national rate.
Bottom line: Utah’s 1982 divorce
rate was 5.4 compared to the national average of 5.2 per thousand. And for that
one-fifth of one percent we seem to take a beating.
Comparatively, the divorce rate in
Utah, as elsewhere, is increasing. The divorce rate in Utah for 1975 was 5.1
compared to a national average of 4.9 per thousand population. Again, a
different of one-fifth of one percent. And during 1975, there were 5,638 divorces
in our state.
A friend, Dr. Terry Olson of BYU,
wrote an article titled “Divorce in the Mountain West.” It was published in the
January 1979 issue of “Mountainwest Magazine.” Dr. Olson noted that Utah is
usually below the majority of states in divorce rates (27th in 1978)
and has the lowest rate of divorces when compared to the mountain states of
Montana, Colorado, Idaho, New Mexico, Wyoming, Arizona, and Nevada. The BYU
professor notes that certain individuals, particularly some associated with the
news media, like to take shots at the various social statics in our state.
“Does it suggest,” Dr. Olson asks,
“as some cynics would hope, that in a region where religious ties are strong,
and where the emphasis on strong family ties is almost unparalleled, that even
religious institutions are unable to offer strategies to stem the tide of
divorce? . . . Examining divorce rates does not reveal much about the people
not divorcing. Therefore, using divorce rates as a measure of relative martial
strength is like examining one patch of dead grass and assuming that the rest
of the lawn is sick.”
Dr. Olson raises an interesting
point. Utah residents appear to be about average in all the reported social
statistics. No worse, but no better, than the rest of the other areas
reporting. But one does wonder, as we look out across the lawn, why one patch died
while the rest survived. And why are some other areas of the lawn somewhere
between bright green and dark brown in color? Not yet dead, but dying. What are
the causes of dying grass, and are they spreading?
Even though we in Utah appear to be
about average, it is, or should be a concern to many that the divorce rate is
as high as it is. In an area where so much emphasis is given to strong marital
and family ties, we seem to have our fair share of disruption.
Why is the divorce rate in Utah as
high as it is? Some think of the Immigrant Import Theory which suggests that
things weren’t that way until all of the out-of-staters stared moving in.
Little do we realize that such attitudes are offensive to recent newcomers to
Utah. And the theory is probably not true.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please share your thoughts about this article