Published
September 22, 1983. Some people become offended at the
idea that we need education about marriage. After all, our parents, and
particularly our grandparents, did not have it or apparently did not need it.
You may be interested to know that
this kind of thinking has a definition. According to Dr. Clark Vincent,
marriage educator and counselor, it is called the “myth of naturalism.” Simply defined, the myth of naturalism
implies that human beings take to marriage as naturally as little ducks take to
water. It is all somehow instinctive, effortless, and automatic
Dr. David Mace, a longtime advocate
of marriage education and enrichment, recently commented on the myth of
naturalism in his book “Close Companions.” He noted, “Even when one marriage in
every two or three breaks down and ends in divorce, we persist obstinately to
believe that no one needs to get involved.
“If planes taking off from our
airports crashed at the same rate as marriages fail, there would be a public
outcry and federal investigation. But when it happens to marriage, the
foundation stone of the family, which in turn is the foundation stone of human
society, we simply shrug our shoulders and say, “Too bad – but what can we do
about it?”
Dr. Mace continues, “If a house
burns, we rush fire engines to the spot. If there’s an accident, we call an
ambulance. If a tree falls on a power wire, a trained team will be there in
minutes. If your telephone goes dead, we’ll have it working in no time. We take
elaborate precautions to protect you from epidemics, to keep food and your
drinking water free from impurities, to provide you with effective sanitation.
We will arrange for you to have regular medical and dental checkups. But your
marriage? Well, you see, that’s something different. You have to understand
that marriage is a personal affair. Marriage is really nobody’s business.”
In “Close Companions.” Dr. Mace then
concludes, “So we remain detached, apparently indifferent, pursuing the policies
adopted years ago before marriage changed from something fairly easy to
something very difficult. As the long, endless line of young men and women move
into marriage, we stand aloof, letting them sink or swim.
“And the fact that we have never
taught them to swim, although we have the knowledge to do so, makes no
difference. The fact that the sea is much rougher than it was in the days when
we adopted the hands-off policy about marriage makes no difference. Even the
possibility that nearly every other one of them is going to sink makes no
difference. We just stand by, awkwardly detached, helplessly incapable—because
it has been decided that marriage is nobody’s business.”
Strong words with a strong argument.
But is Dr. Mace correct? Do we need marriage education, both before and after
the wedding? We who are involved in the field of marriage education and
counseling do not claim to know all the answers or even all the questions. But
we are making headway.
A few weeks ago, I had an
interesting phone conversation with Dr. David Olson at the University of
Minnesota. Dr. Olson is one of the best researchers in the area of marriage in
the United Sates today. Through his research, Dr. Olson found that a stable and
satisfying marriage depends on knowledge and skills in about 10 to 12 specific
areas. I will be meeting with Dr. Olson next month in Minnesota and look
forward to our discussions.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please share your thoughts about this article