Published
May 23, 1985. I was talking to a woman during the
past week who was very upset. Her son, now in his late twenties, had become
involved in an activity she deemed inappropriate. Still, the son persisted in
participating in the undesirable behavior.
The more we talked, the more I could
understand her concern. But it also became obvious that she held herself and
her husband responsible for their son’s misconduct. She felt terribly guilty.
There is a name for what the mother was feeling. It is called parental
determinism. Parental determinism suggests that parents determine what their
children become. It is widely believed in our area.
If parents have model children who
become first in everything that is desirable and good, then it is very easy to
subscribe to the parental determinism philosophy. But what about good parents
who have children who, for one reason or another, do not follow the guidelines
and values advocated by the mother and father? Does it mean that the parents
have failed in their attempts to raise their child well? If you accept parental
determinism literally, you might draw that conclusion.
People who follow this line of
thought often quote a Bible verse. In Proverbs 22:6 it states, “Train up a
child in the way he should go: and when he is old, he will not depart from it.”
The implication is if a child does “depart,” then he or she has not been
adequately trained. And many parents, like the mother with whom I was
conversing, felt that her son’s misconduct was an indication that he had not
been properly trained.
I once read another interpretation
of Proverbs 22:6. It implied, “Give in to a child all the time (train up a
child the way he wants to go), and when he is old he will continue in the same
way.” That is, allow the child to be self-centered, and when he is old he will
continue to be selfish. The implication still is that the child is the father
of the man. But this interpretation does not suggest that parents are totally
responsible for their children’s outcome.
The philosophy of parental
determinism in controversial, partly because it is so widely accepted. I often
discuss it with my colleagues. Some believe, and I agree, that parents have the
first and best opportunity to direct the lives of their children. A few of my
associates hold to the parental determinism point of view. Still others
acknowledge that, in addition to the home and parents, there are many other
factors that contribute to a child’s outcome. Among these would be other
siblings, education, peer influence, the mass media, religion, and the
individual’s own agency, or freedom.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please share your thoughts about this article