Published October 3, 1985. The story is told of two hardened prisoners who were locked
together in a small prison cell for several years. During their years of
imprisonment they got along fairly well, had relatively few conflicts, and
endured the prison terms together. When one prisoner was about to be released,
he was interviewed and questioned by the prison warden. Much to the surprise of
the prison official, the prisoner being released knew very little, practically
nothing, about his fellow cell mate. They had lived together in a small cell of
just a few cubic feet for years and exchanged just enough information with each
other to get by. Even though they had spent tens of thousands of
hours together, they scarcely knew anything about the personal lives of each
other, their backgrounds, or their feelings.
The analogy may not be appropriate for contemporary
marriage. But then again, it may. Many marriage partners feel just because they
live with and are around each other for hours on end, they will get to know
each other. Often they don’t because they are prisoners of a different sort.
They are prisoners in that each person confines him or herself to their own
thoughts, feelings, and ideas.
Contrast these types of prisoners with people who meet
on an airplane for just a few hours. Within a short period of time they have
often conveyed more to each other, about each other than they have with any
other acquaintances, including a spouse. The observation? The actual
amount of time a couple spends together is no measurement of their ability to
communicate with each other.
Sometimes we assume that merely exchanging information is
communication. And in a way it is. Exchanging information is essential for our
well-being and our survival. But, as noted, most people are more interested in
what they personally have to say than they are of others. Everyone wants to be
senders, and relatively few want to be receivers. And when we do speak to one
other it is usually on one of four different levels: (1) Things, (2) People, (3)
Ideas, and (4) Feelings.
Most of our “conversations” deal with levels one and two. Things
and People. These are the safest areas and take the least amount of
involvement. We talk about the weather, the ballgame, the yard, the garden,
neighbors, friends, children, and relatives because everyone usually has
something to say about these two areas. But it is much more difficult to move
to levels three and four, Ideas and Feelings, with other people, including a
marriage partner. But it is usually the discussion of these latter two areas
that forms the greater bonds between people. Discussion about things and people
usually do not.
The need for husbands and wives to constantly keep in
contact with each other through communication is expressed in the poem “Tapestry
“ by Cheryl Ploetz:
Love can be a tapestry, each one original, each one unique,Threads are spun by faith and trust, their strength measured.Colors added brilliantly in some, drab subtles in others, perhaps a beautiful blend.Patterns often repeated or changed in complexity, humor, and sharing lend both.Flaws where sharp words sever the very fibers are carefully ended with forgiveness.Love is a tapestry, each one original, each one woven with time.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please share your thoughts about this article